Received Date:2026-01-23 Accepted Date:2026-04-01
Download
2026 NO.02
Against the backdrop of continued industrialization and China′s "dual-carbon" targets, industrial solid waste (ISW) generation has exhibited persistent growth amidst structural adjustments and governance transitions. Understanding whether this growth follows a stable trajectory or undergoes stage-specific shifts is essential for interpreting governance outcomes and designing differentiated waste management strategies. This study applies a data-driven analytical framework to a city-level panel dataset to identify the long-term stage structure of urban ISW generation in China from 2003 to 2019 and to examine how its driving mechanisms evolve across different stages and spatial scales. First, unsupervised time-series structural learning is employed to detect endogenous stage boundaries in national ISW generation without predefined breakpoints. Second, inter-stage changes are decomposed into population scale, economic affluence, industrial structure, and composite intensity effects using the Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index (LMDI) method. Third, city-level dynamics are analyzed using two-way fixed effects models and a random forest-based feature selection procedure to identify governance-relevant signals that remain stable at the annual municipal scale. We identify three stable stages: 2003–2007, 2008–2012, and 2013–2019. Total ISW continued to increase in all stages; however, the growth rate declined over time. Scale effects remained persistently positive, strengthened across stages, and explained 33.4% of cumulative growth. The post-2013 slowdown primarily reflects a structural transition. The industrial structure effect shifted from a positive contribution (+113 Mt) to a substantial negative contribution (−290 Mt). In contrast, the intensity effect was negative across all stages, with minimal variation in magnitude, indicating a stable offset rather than a trigger for a stage change. Regionally, all major regions shared a common temporal stage structure but relied on different pathways to mitigate scale-driven growth. In the later stage (2013–2019), the Eastern and Central regions primarily depended on intensity-related mitigation, whereas the Western regions exhibited stronger structural offsets. Northeast China, however, demonstrated a notable deviation in driving mechanisms in the later stage, during which the intensity effect turned positive and became the dominant contributor to regional ISW changes. City-level evidence suggests this pattern is consistent in direction across cities but highly concentrated in magnitude, with a small number of cities accounting for most of the positive intensity contribution. At the city scale, ISW generation is more responsive to short-term interannual changes in industrial activity intensity than to variations in economic scale or industrial structure, once time-invariant city characteristics and common shocks are controlled for (coefficient = 0.0787,